|


In July of 2002 I wrote an
article called All About Salt in
which I stated that "the only difference between
ordinary table salt and gourmet sea salt is the price"
and "What it boils down to is this: salt is salt. ...
Regardless of where it came from or how it is processed,
salt is always salt." These statements caused quite a
bit of controversy at the time of their original
publication and have continued to provoke nasty remarks
since then, owing to the article's more-or-less
continuous presence on the World Wide Web. (If you do a
Google search for "all about salt" you will probably
find my website among the top results.)
In early May of 2012, after a
particularly rancorous exchange of emails with some guy
who took issue with those remarks (and who, by the way,
was also in the business of selling "Fleur de Sel
Caramels" at ridiculous prices—go figure), I decided it
was time to prove my assertions once and for all. Thus
was conceived The Great Salt Taste Test.
If my contention that all salts
taste the same is proven to be wrong, I will make a
public admission of my error like a man. Then I will withdraw
completely from society and live the rest of my days
alone, pale and blinking, in a dark cave somewhere. If,
on the other hand, a carefully controlled blind taste
test performed by a large number of volunteer subjects
supports my hypothesis, then I will jump up and down, whooping
and hollering like a ten-year-old boy, and you'll never
hear the end of it.
Let the experiment begin!

To determine whether people
can distinguish between various salts, at a concentration
comparable to many common foods,
in a controlled blind taste test.

I think I have already made my
opinion on the subject pretty clear, but let me state it
for the record anyway: all salts taste the same.
Stated differently, I believe
that this experiment will demonstrate that people do not
have a preference for expensive salts over ordinary
table salt. It's all a matter of some pretty simple
arithmetic. Let me explain.
In order to be sold as salt for human
consumption in the United States, the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration requires that it be at least 97.5% (by
weight) pure sodium chloride. That means that everything
else that the salt is made of (which I will henceforth
refer to as "other stuff") can be, by law, no more than
2.5% of the total weight. That's Fact #1—please remember
it.
Fact #2 is that most foods we eat contain no
more than about 1% salt by weight because anything above
that is deemed too salty by most people (see the
procedure section below).
So all the other stuff, the
chemical compounds that the purveyors of expensive salts
insist provide the unique flavor of their salt, only
amounts to 0.025% of the foods we eat under normal
circumstances (Fact #1 multiplied by Fact #2, or for the
mathematically skeptical, 0.025 x 0.01 = 0.00025).
In other words, it's only 2.5 parts per 10,000, or
250 parts per million. That's a very small amount.
Think of it this way: 2.5 parts
of other stuff (by weight) per 10,000 parts water is the
equivalent of about ½ teaspoon in 10 liters (a little
over 2½ gallons). There are very few things that the
human sense of taste can detect in such small
concentrations, and I am pretty sure that the various
compounds of magnesium, potassium, calcium, and other
elements that constitute the other stuff in salt
are not among them. We can't even detect table salt at
that concentration (go ahead and try it if you don't
believe me), so why would we be able to taste the other
stuff?
Therefore, the only thing we taste in salt is the
sodium chloride, and that's why all salts taste the same.


To determine the appropriate level of salinity for
the test samples (see Procedure - Step 1 below) I used
several items that I had on hand. These included a glass
measuring cup, a silver teaspoon to stir the water, a
plastic measuring spoon, and my jeweler's scale. The
salt I used for this portion of the experiment was the
Diamond Crystal kosher salt that I use for everyday
cooking.
The scale I used to weigh the salt in all phases of
the experiment is a model AMW-100 Precision Pocket Scale
manufactured by American Weigh Scales. It has a maximum
capacity of 100 grams and is rated at 0.01 gram
precision. It was calibrated immediately prior to the
start of the experiment using a 100-gram weight I
purchased for that purpose.
For
Step 2 of the experiment, in which I prepared the test
samples, I purchased some laboratory equipment to ensure
precise measuring. These items included a 1000-ml glass
beaker and a glass stirring rod. (The non-reactive
nature of the beaker and stirring rod will also prevent
contamination of the samples.) I also bought 350 60-ml
bottles made of food-grade PET plastic for the test
samples, and 50 100-ml food-grade PET plastic bottles
for the control samples. I used a 60-ml plastic syringe
to transfer the samples from the beaker to the bottles.
The
remaining supplies for the experiment include eight
samples of salt from eight different manufacturers, and
six gallons of distilled water from my supermarket. The
test instructions were printed on some
4x6-inch cards,
and the testers will use the same cards to record their
test results and return them to me in envelopes I
provide. I used Avery 1-inch round labels to clearly
identify the test and control sample bottles. The United
States Postal Service was kind enough to provide 50
Small Flat Rate Priority Mail boxes (at no charge) for
shipping the samples to the testers.

Step 1 - In order to ensure that
the testers would be able to judge the taste of the
salts without being influenced by the color, size, or
texture of the salt crystals, I decided that the salt
samples in this experiment would be dissolved in water
at a concentration that would be similar to the
concentration found in many common foods. After all, this is The Great Salt
Taste Test, not the Great Salt Texture Test, right? The
first thing I had to determine was an appropriate level
of salinity, so I devised an experiment that Goldilocks
would have been proud of.
I measured 1 liter of water in
my large kitchen measuring cup, and then dissolved 1
teaspoon of kosher salt in the water. I tasted it and
found that it wasn't salty enough—the salt was barely
perceptible. I dissolved another teaspoon of salt and
tasted it. This ratio of 2 teaspoons per liter of water
was pleasantly salty. Then I added another teaspoon of
salt, tasted again, and found it to be too salty. If I
had been served a bowl of soup in a restaurant that was
that salty, I would have sent it back to the kitchen. My
laboratory assistant (who goes by the name of Mom around
here) also tasted the different solutions and concurred
with my findings. Thanks, Mom.
I decided that 2 teaspoons of
salt per liter of water was a suitable analog for many everyday
foods (think of it as chicken soup without the chicken)
and that it was "just right" for this experiment.
However, I know that measuring salt by volume is
notoriously inaccurate due to the different sizes and
shapes of salt crystals, and that a teaspoon of salt can weigh from about 2.5
to more than 6 grams. (The salts used in this experiment
range from 2.8 to 6 grams per teaspoon according to the
nutrition facts on the labels.) The only way to make sure
that all of the samples of salty water were of the same
concentration would be to measure the salts by weight,
so I weighed 2 teaspoons of the same kosher salt on my
jeweler's scale and found that it weighed 10.1 grams.
Thanks to the elegant simplicity
of the metric system in which units of weight are
defined by volumes of water, 1 liter of water at
standard temperature and pressure weighs, by definition,
exactly 1,000 grams. Conveniently, 10 grams of salt per
1,000 grams of water provides a concentration of exactly
1%. I thought this was the kind of number I might be
able to remember without having to constantly consult my
notes, so I decided to use this proportion to make all
of the samples of salty water to be used in the
experiment.
Update - June 15, 2012 - I
realized that many people probably don't share my
preference for lightly salted foods. I also wanted the
samples to have a more pronounced taste of salt in order
to give the testers more to work with in terms of
flavor, so I decided to increase the concentration of
the salt in the samples. I mixed batches of salt water
at concentrations of 1% (the same as before, for
comparison) and 1.1%, 1.2%, and 1.3%. Although they all
tasted very similar, my laboratory
assistant and I agreed that the 1.2% sample (that's 12 grams of salt dissolved in 1 liter of water) was
still pleasantly salty and more analogous to canned soup
than the 1% sample. Therefore it was decided that the
test samples and control sample would all be prepared at
a concentration of 1.2%. I sure hope I don't forget to
write that down somewhere.
Step 2 - 350 small (60 ml)
bottles made of food-grade PET plastic were labeled A,
B, C, D, E, F, and G in quantities of 50 each. The 50
larger (100 ml) food-grade PET bottles were labeled
"Control." 12 grams of each salt was added to 1000 ml of
distilled water at room temperature in the glass beaker
and stirred with the glass rod until completely
dissolved. The resulting solutions were transferred to
the plastic bottles using the plastic syringe. This
procedure was repeated for each salt sample until 50
bottles were filled with approximately 50 ml (for the
test samples) or 100 ml (for the control samples) of the
solutions.
One bottle of each of the seven
test samples and a bottle of the control sample were
placed in 50 gallon-size plastic zipper bags, and these
were placed in 50 Small Flat Rate Priority Mail boxes
which were subsequently labeled and shipped over a
period of several days, beginning June 20, 2012. Also
included in each box was a 5 ½ x 8 ½-inch note card with
printed instructions and a grid for recording the test
results (see below) along with an addressed envelope to
be used to mail the test results to me. Each card was
identified by a control number for tracking purposes.
Step 3 - I received a total of 46 of the
50 score cards that I sent out, yielding a response rate
of 92 percent.
I had asked the tasters to
compare each test sample to the control sample and to
score them based on whether they liked the test sample
more than the control or less than the control. The
tasters were given a third option of "No opinion" if
they liked them equally, or if they couldn't detect a
difference between the test sample and the control (see above).
Upon receipt of the score cards
from the tasters, the individual scores for
each test sample were entered into an Excel spreadsheet.
If a test sample was liked more than the control, it was
given a numerical value of +1. If a test sample was
liked less than the control, it was assigned a value of
-1. If the test sample was scored "no opinion," it was
assigned a value of zero. The 46 ratings for each test
sample were then totaled and an overall numerical score
was calculated for each of the seven test samples. Using
this methodology, the total scores for the test samples
should approach zero if my hypothesis is correct and
people are not able to "distinguish between various salts, at a concentration
comparable to many common foods,
in a controlled blind taste test." On the other hand, if
any of the test samples score a significant positive or
negative score, then my hypothesis will be disproven.

Below is a table
describing the salts I chose to be tested in this
experiment along with their scores in the taste test. Three of them came from my local
supermarket, and the rest were bought online through Amazon.com. They ranged in price from 41¢ to almost $70
per pound. The control salt (the salt the tasters were
instructed to compare the other salts to) was
pharmaceutical-grade sodium chloride that I chose
because it is the closest thing to pure
sodium chloride that I was able to find.
|
Sample A

|
Alessi Fine Sea
Salt from the Mediterranean
Source: Ingle's
Supermarket, Monticello, GA
Price: $2.15 for 24 oz ($1.43 per pound)
Ingredients: None listed on label
Serving size (per label): ¼ TSP (1.2g)
Website:
http://www.vigo-alessi.com
This salt dissolved
easily and the resulting solution was crystal
clear to the naked eye.
Taste test score:
3
11 tasters (23.9%)
liked this salt more than the control, 8 tasters
(17.4%) liked this salt less than the control,
and 27 tasters (58.7%) gave it a "no opinion"
rating.
|
|
Sample B
 |
Brittany Sea Salt
Coarse Gray Sea Salt from Guérande
Source: Amazon.com
Price: $4.75 for 3.3 oz ($23.03 per pound)
Ingredients: Guérande coarse gray salt
Serving size (per label): ¼ TSP (1g)
Website:
http://www.brittanysalt.com
This salt dissolved
easily and produced a cloudy grey-brown solution
resembling sea water. Small bubbles formed on
the surface of the water when it was stirred to
dissolve the salt. The appearance was
unappetizing, and the solution left a "ring"
around the beaker at the waterline which
persisted after the beaker was rinsed. The
beaker had to be cleaned with a soapy sponge in
order to remove the residue.
Taste test score:
-11
9 tasters (19.5%)
liked this salt more than the control, 20
tasters (43.5%) liked this salt less than the
control, and 17 tasters (36.9%) gave it a "no
opinion" rating. This is the only salt that
received a negative rating.
|
|
Sample C

|
Diamond Crystal
Kosher Salt
Source: Ingle's Supermarket, Monticello, GA
Price: $0.98 for 13 oz ($1.21 per pound)
Ingredients: Salt
Serving size (per label): ¼ TSP (0.7g)
Website:
http://www.diamondcrystalsalt.com
This salt dissolved
easily and the resulting solution was crystal
clear to the naked eye.
Taste test score:
11
16 tasters (34.8%)
liked this salt more than the control, 5 tasters
(10.8%) liked this salt less than the control,
and 25 tasters (54.3%) gave it a "no opinion"
rating. This was the most popular salt. It was
also the second least expensive.
|
|
Sample D

|
Le Paludier Fleur
de Sel de Guérande
Source: Amazon.com
Price: $17.95 for 4.4 oz ($65.27 or $69.55 per
pound)
Ingredients: Sel marin gris de table
Serving size (per label): None listed
Website:
http://www.lepaludier.com
This salt dissolved
easily and the resulting solution appeared clear
and slightly grey. It was noted that the salt
was moist, and the label refers to "exquisite
moist granules." I dried 50 grams of the salt by
letting it sit in the open air for several days,
and the sample weighed 46.92 grams after drying.
This represents a water content of 6.16% by
weight, and when adjusted to account for the
weight of the water, the cost per pound of the
salt was actually $69.55. The dried salt was
used to prepare the test samples in order to
ensure that the amount of salt in the solution
was identical for all the salts.
Taste test score:
4
10 tasters (21.7%)
liked this salt more than the control, 6 tasters
(13.0%) liked this salt less than the control,
and 30 tasters (65.2%) gave it a "no opinion"
rating.
|
|
Sample E

|
Maldon Sea Salt
Flakes Source:
Amazon.com
Price: $8.55 for 8.5 oz ($16.09 per pound)
Ingredients: Sea salt flakes with no additives
Serving size (per label): ¼ TSP (1.5g)
Website:
http://www.maldonsalt.co.uk
This salt dissolved
easily and the resulting solution was crystal
clear to the naked eye.
Taste test score:
0
11 tasters (23.9%)
liked this salt more than the control, 11
tasters (23.9%) liked this salt less than the
control, and 24 tasters (52.2%) gave it a "no
opinion" rating.
|
|
Sample F

|
Morton Iodized
Salt Source:
Ingle's Supermarket, Monticello, GA
Price: $0.67 for 26 oz ($0.41 per pound)
Ingredients: Salt, calcium silicate (an
anticaking agent), dextrose, potassium iodide
Serving size (per label): ¼ TSP (1.5g)
Website:
http://www.mortonsalt.com
This salt dissolved
easily and the resulting solution was cloudy and
white in color. This is the only iodized salt in
the taste test. It is also the only salt that
lists anything other than salt in the
ingredients.
Taste test score:
3
14 tasters (30.4%)
liked this salt more than the control, 11
tasters (23.9%) liked this salt less than the
control, and 21 tasters (45.6%) gave it a "no
opinion" rating.
|
|
Sample G

|
Swanson Ultra
Himalayan Crystal Salt
Source: Amazon.com
Price: $9.45 for 5.29 oz ($28.58 per pound)
Ingredients: 100% natural Himalayan crystal salt
Serving size (per label): ¼ TSP (1.5g)
Website:
http://www.swansonvitamins.com
This salt dissolved
easily and the resulting solution was a very
pale pink color.
Taste test score:
9
15 tasters (32.6%)
liked this salt more than the control, 6 tasters
(13.0%) liked this salt less than the control,
and 25 tasters (54.3%) gave it a "no opinion"
rating. This was the second most popular salt.
|
|
Control

|
CMC Sodium
Chloride Tablets U.S.P.
Source: Amazon.com
Price: $11.95 for 3.3 oz ($57.93 per pound)
Ingredients: Sodium chloride USP - Product does
not contain any inactive ingredients.
Serving size (per label): Take as directed by
your physician.
Website: None
This salt required
vigorous stirring to dissolve due to the size of
the tablets (1 gram each) and the resulting
solution was crystal clear to the naked eye. The
actual purity of the salt is not stated on the
label, and apparently the U.S.P. (United States
Pharmacopeia) designation does not imply a
specific degree of purity. I telephoned the
manufacturer in Brewster, New York and spoke to
Frank Debora, the president of Consolidated
Midland Corporation. He stated that the salt was
at least 99.9 percent pure sodium chloride, and
that it is "the closest thing to pure sodium
chloride that you'll find anywhere." Based on
these assurances, I believe I am safe in saying
that the control sample in this experiment is at
least 99.9% pure sodium chloride.
|

Since the objective of this
experiment was "to determine whether people
can distinguish between various salts, at a concentration
comparable to many common foods,
in a controlled blind taste test," let's take a look at
that first. My expectation was that the taste test
scores of the different salts would all be close to zero
due to the way I assigned a positive value to those
samples that people liked more than the control sample,
and the negative value to the samples that people liked
less than the control. In other words, I thought the
"likes" and the "dislikes" would cancel each other out.
For the majority of the salts,
that is exactly what happened … I think. Samples A, D,
E, and F all scored a total between zero and 4, and I
think those are probably within the margin of error of
the sampling method and therefore equivalent to a total
of zero. (I could use the help of an expert here, so if
anyone out there is a bona fide statistician with
verifiable credentials, I sure would like to hear from
you.)
Samples B, C, and G don't fall
within the same category and even I'm not going to
suggest
that scores of -11, 11, and 9 fall within the margin of
error. People could clearly distinguish these salts from
the control sample, and showed a marked preference
(samples C and G) or dislike (sample B) when compared to
the control sample. There is no denying that some of the
tasters could distinguish between some of the salts.
Looking at it from another
perspective, 46 tasters each sampled seven salts,
producing a total of 322 responses. Of those, 173
responses were "no opinion," indicating that more than
half (53.7%) of the samples were indistinguishable from
the control sample.
I think that, based on the
results of the Great Salt Taste Test, it is fair to say
that some people can distinguish between some salts (at
a concentration comparable to blah blah blah),
and most people cannot distinguish between most salts.
Now, what about the other
pronouncements I made in the Hypothesis section above?
Let's start with "all salts taste the same." I concede
that this is not supported by the results. It appears
that most, but not all salts taste the same to most, but
not all people. I stand corrected.
And what about my assertion that
"people do not have a preference for expensive salts
over ordinary table salt"? I think I nailed that
one, and as evidence I offer the following three items:
Item 1 - The most popular salt,
by a wide margin, was sample C, an ordinary, everyday
kosher salt from my local supermarket.
Item 2 - The only salt that the
tasters actively disliked was one of the expensive sea
salts. The only salt to receive a negative rating (11
more people disliked it than liked it) is also among the
most expensive. It was also the salt that received the
fewest "no opinion" ratings, showing that more people
had an opinion about this salt than any other. (It also
looked nasty when I made up the sample batches, but the
tasters didn't know that.)
Item 3 - The salt with the most
"no opinion" ratings, with a whopping 65.2 percent of
the tasters demonstrating indifference, was sample D,
the most expensive salt of the bunch. In terms of the
number of people who couldn't tell the difference
between an expensive sea salt and regular salt, this one
was the clear winner.
I won't try to ignore that one
salt that was favored by the testers was an expensive
sea salt (sample G), but considering that overall the
expensive sea salts didn't fare any better than the
inexpensive supermarket salts (and bearing in mind the
three items I just presented), I'm going to stick my
neck out and claim a victory for this statement: people
do not have a preference for expensive salts over
ordinary table salt.
If you disagree with any of my
conclusions, I would love to hear from you.

The Wet Finger Method -
Several people have written to point
out that tasting samples of salty water is very
different from tasting the actual salts. For the record,
let me state: I couldn't agree more.
Many of the so-called salt taste
tests that you'll find on the internet use what I call
the wet finger method in which the tasters lick the tip
of their finger before dabbing the various
salts. It's hard to think of a less precise method, but
there you have it. In fact, it's so darned unscientific
that I decided to perform a little experiment to
demonstrate that comparing salts by the wet finger method
produces worthless results.
I had ten friends taste two
samples of salt by the wet finger method. The salts were
contained in identical containers labeled A and B, and I
asked them to tell me which one tasted saltier, or if
they both tasted the same. Of the ten tasters, six
said that A tasted saltier and four said that B tasted
saltier. Or was it the other way around? I don't
remember.
It doesn't matter which one they
thought tasted saltier because both of the samples were
the same salt. The fact that not a single taster said they
thought the two samples tasted the same proves that the
wet finger method is a lousy way to compare salts.
If a taster happened to get more
salt on their fingertip when they tasted sample A versus
sample B, then it is perfectly understandable that it
tasted saltier. This is the same logic that says if
you put too much salt on your French fries, they're
going to taste saltier than French fries that have less
salt on them. Stated differently, any moron knows that.
The only things an uncontrolled
method such as the wet finger method can reasonably be
expected to produce are bogus results and skepticism
among intelligent individuals, and this is why I never
even considered using such a method in The Great Salt
Taste Test.
Flavored Salts - I think a word
about some of the salts that I didn't choose is
in order. There are many expensive "smoked" salts on the
market that I didn't include in this experiment because
I have no doubt that they all have a pronounced smoky
taste. There is nothing wrong with that, but there are
other less expensive ways to give your food a smoky
flavor.
There are also some salts, often identified as
being from Hawaii, that are adulterated with things not
found in sea water. These include a red salt that gets
its color from pulverized clay (I have a whole yard
filled with red Georgia clay, and you are welcome to
come and get all you want on the sole condition that you
must sprinkle it on your food and eat it), and a
black sea salt that features powdered charcoal (what's
next, ashtray-flavored salt?) These were not included in
the Great Salt Taste Test for what I hope are obvious
reasons.
|